News Market News
UK Industry warns of gaps in chromium VI regulation
One year after long-term authorisation was granted under UK REACH, surface engineering specialists are raising concerns that inconsistent enforcement could undermine both environmental protections and fair competition within the sector.
BEP Surface Technologies, based in Radcliffe, Greater Manchester, has cautioned that the effectiveness of the UK’s 12-year authorisation framework depends on consistent application across the entire market. The company, which supports sectors including manufacturing, defence, aerospace and packaging, said its concerns are shared more widely through the Surface Engineering Association (SEA), which represents a consortium of 23 companies.
The authorisation, administered by the Health and Safety Executive, provided certainty following years of disruption linked to the EU’s 2017 sunset deadline and the post-Brexit regulatory transition. However, there are indications that not all operators may be working within the authorised framework. Chromium VI, is widely used in surface finishing to provide corrosion resistance and durability, but is subject to strict regulation due to its environmental and health risks.
Level playing field at risk
Andrew McClusky, Managing Director of BEP Surface Technologies, said: “The authorisation process has removed a significant level of uncertainty and allowed businesses to focus on investment and long-term capability. However, that framework only works if it is applied consistently. Where operators fall outside it, this raises important questions about environmental risk, regulatory consistency, and fair competition.”
“For those that have committed significant time and resources to achieving compliance, maintaining a level playing field is critical to the long-term stability of the sector,” he added. The authorisation process requires detailed technical submissions covering worker safety, emissions control and commitments to continuous improvement. Authorised operators are subject to ongoing inspection and performance monitoring.
Dave Elliott, Chief Executive of the SEA, said: “For companies that have gone through the authorisation process, the requirements are rigorous and ongoing, covering operational controls, environmental safeguards and continuous monitoring. However, where operators are not working within the authorised framework, it creates a clear imbalance. Consistent enforcement is essential to maintaining both environmental protection and confidence across the sector.”
Diverging UK and EU approaches on Chromium VI
Alongside enforcement concerns, divergence between UK and EU regulatory approaches is beginning to influence market dynamics. While the UK has established a defined authorisation pathway, the EU is moving towards a broader restriction model for chromium VI under REACH, creating continued uncertainty for European manufacturers.
This shift is already being reflected in supply chain behaviour, with UK operators reporting increased enquiries from European customers seeking greater certainty around long-term chrome plating capability as regulatory timelines remain in flux.
As the sector moves beyond the initial milestone of authorisation, industry representatives say the focus must now shift to enforcement, regulatory consistency and how both frameworks will shape the future of chrome-based surface engineering.
More information: bep-st.com